Menu
VideoParliament
VideoParliament Irish politics in one place — download the app
Get app
VideoParliament
VideoParliament for Windows Get the desktop app — notifications about new speeches
Get app
Paul Nicholas Gogarty: Gene-edited foods risk Irish organic farms

Paul Nicholas Gogarty: Gene-edited foods risk Irish organic farms

Paul Nicholas Gogarty warns that the European Parliament will vote this Monday on a framework that could allow gene-edited foods into Irish supermarkets with no consumer labelling or safety screening. He argues the law would not let Ireland ban import or transport of EU-approved genetic material, posing risks to farmers and enabling patent control.

Immediate summary


Paul Nicholas Gogarty highlights an imminent European Parliament vote and explains why the proposed framework matters now: it would permit gene-edited food and feed into the market without labelling or additional safety screening, while Ireland retains a domestic ban on cultivating traditional GMOs.

Risk to farmers and certification


Gogarty raises specific concern for farmers who rely on maintaining NGT-free crops, warning that trace windborne NGT could cause loss of certification. He frames this as a direct threat to livelihoods in the organic sector and to consumer transparency.

Patentability and corporate control


The speaker says the law could enable earlier legislation to make such genetic material patentable in this context, giving corporations control over biological material used in food and feed. He stresses the implications for ownership and market power.

Request for political scrutiny


Gogarty asks whether the government will instruct its MEPs to vote against the framework to allow further scrutiny before it proceeds. He also notes he will engage with his party MEPs and follow up on the issue.

Paul Nicholas Gogarty — still from statement: Paul Nicholas Gogarty: Gene-edited foods risk Irish organic farms (14.05.2026)

Implications for public debate


The address frames labelling, safety screening, import rules, and patentability as interlinked policy questions that affect consumer choice, farm certification and corporate influence. The speaker positions the upcoming vote as a moment for public and political scrutiny.

We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.

Tego samego dnia All speeches from this day →

Transcript
This coming Monday, the European Parliament votes on a framework that's going to allow gene-edited foods onto Irish supermarket shelves with zero consumer labelling and no safety screening. So while we have our own ban on the cultivation of traditional GMOs, we can't under this legislation ban the import and transport of EU-approved genetic material for food and animal feed. So there's a real risk that Irish organic farmers, whose livelihoods depend on keeping their crops entirely NGT-free, will actually be contaminated, because trace amounts of windblown NGT can lose organic certification. My understanding is also that under this final law, because it allows for an earlier law to be brought in, it's making GMOs, in this context anyway, fully patentable. So therefore corporations will have control over some of the material. So I'm asking you, in this context, given the government had allowed us to proceed to this stage, will you now instruct government MEPs to vote against legislation so we can have further scrutiny, because it is actually going to put a risk to Irish organic farming? I've had this long enough to know I never instruct my MEPs, they'll each consider and scrutinise these issues as well, but you do highlight an important issue, which I'm not going to pretend to be across all of the detail of, but I'll make myself familiar on it now on foot of you raising this, and I'll certainly engage with my own party MEPs in advance of that vote on Monday. I'm happy to come back to you on that.