Brian Stanley presses government over 15-year wind delay
Brian Stanley challenged the government in the Dáil over a prolonged delay to wind energy regulation, questioning why guidelines first promised years ago still have not been finalised. He raised the stalled Wind Turbine Regulation Bill 2025 and repeated departmental replies that a review of the 2006 Wind Energy Guidelines is under way.
Brian Stanley demanded clarity and speed from Ministers, arguing that nearly a decade and a half of repetitive answers is unacceptable. He pressed the Taoiseach in the chamber for a concrete timetable and highlighted the wider need to increase renewable energy supply and energy self-sufficiency.
The Deputy noted that parliamentary replies have repeated the same points for years, referring to a focused review of the 2006 Wind Energy Guidelines. He criticised the pattern of delay and sceptical language from departments that has stalled decision-making on onshore wind regulation.
Stanley acknowledged onshore wind's substantial contribution to electricity generation but warned the forthcoming guidelines may restrict onshore development. He argued that offshore wind should be a priority for the coming decade while admitting the country faces difficult choices on energy independence.
The exchange underlines growing impatience in the Dáil over renewable policy and signals a call for a broader public discussion on how to balance onshore and offshore development while reducing dependence on external energy sources.
Demand for immediate action
Brian Stanley demanded clarity and speed from Ministers, arguing that nearly a decade and a half of repetitive answers is unacceptable. He pressed the Taoiseach in the chamber for a concrete timetable and highlighted the wider need to increase renewable energy supply and energy self-sufficiency.
Departmental replies and the 2006 review
The Deputy noted that parliamentary replies have repeated the same points for years, referring to a focused review of the 2006 Wind Energy Guidelines. He criticised the pattern of delay and sceptical language from departments that has stalled decision-making on onshore wind regulation.
Onshore contribution and an offshore future
Stanley acknowledged onshore wind's substantial contribution to electricity generation but warned the forthcoming guidelines may restrict onshore development. He argued that offshore wind should be a priority for the coming decade while admitting the country faces difficult choices on energy independence.
Political consequence and public debate
The exchange underlines growing impatience in the Dáil over renewable policy and signals a call for a broader public discussion on how to balance onshore and offshore development while reducing dependence on external energy sources.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
Other speeches
Brian Stanley: Urgent call to replace Laois jobs after Leprino closure
Brian Stanley questions reference rents and rent top-ups
Brian Stanley: Urgent call to fix driving test backlog
Brian Stanley: Target Fuel Relief - Protect Rural Households
Brian Stanley demands immediate passage of Occupied Territories Bill
Brian Stanley challenges Reserve Defence Forces funding and training
Tego samego dnia All speeches from this day →
Michael Fitzmaurice
Michael Fitzmaurice: Warns EU Rules Could End Live Exports
Jim O'Callaghan
Jim O'Callaghan: ARP Extended to 2027 - Numbers & Next Steps
Ruth Coppinger
Ruth Coppinger demands probe into Ambulance Service
Paul Murphy
Paul Murphy: Cuts to Ukrainian Hosts Will Fuel Homelessness
Paul Donnelly
Paul Donnelly: Garda Resources Fail Local Communities
John McGuinness
John McGuinness: Administration failing - consumers pay
Transcript
Back last November we were called to have brought forward Wind Turbine Regulation Bill 2025 for the Dáil party to try and get through, but also in an effort to try and move the government on this issue. Now, I've been receiving parliamentary replies to this for a decade and a half now, and the most recent one at the start of this month says that my department is currently undertaking a focused review of the 2006 Wind Energy Guidelines. It went on to say that the review is addressing a number of key aspects of the guidelines, blah blah blah. Now that's the same reply as I've been getting for a decade and a half, and what I want to ask is this, is that back when I brought that forward, as a government you said you would bring forward guidelines within three months. Now you and I know, and the government know, that given the debates in the House this week, that we need to be increasing our renewable energy supply, because we need to become more energy self-sufficient, right, we can't be dependent on Trump and the Bias. So nearly a decade and a half has passed, four governments, who's blocking it, and we need to sort it out, we cannot have a situation where it takes 15 years to get guidelines in place. I think you'll agree with that, it can't take- Thank you Debra, Taoiseach respond please. I think it's a tribute to your own growing longevity in the House, I said it's a tribute to your own growing longevity in the House. It's been a decade and a half getting a consistent reply from the Department. I understand the issue, but let's be honest about it, when these guidelines emerge it probably will lead to a reduction in wind farms, so we can't sort of dress it up and say that the guidelines will help to expand onshore wind energy, because all of the input is from deputies and everyone is to try and restrict the growth of onshore wind farms. No, we've had incredible expansion, let's be honest, so that's why I think offshore is where we need to go now for the next decade. But that said, the onshore has made an enormous contribution to electricity generation, and we kind of shield ourselves from the hard choices as a society. Like I said yesterday, I was in here when people were against onshore wind, gas generation, solar, and we have a huge challenge in terms of energy independence. We probably need a greater discussion on that.